| At the present time, the Virginia Department of Corrections and
the state of Virginia are operating under two laws when it comes to the
prison system and its' prisoners. Prior to, January 1, 1995, the prison
system consisted only of what's known as "old law prisoners". These old
law prisoners, who's crimes were committed prior to January 1, 1005, are
prisoners that are eligible for parole release. Meaning, they must be annually
interviewed and evaluated by the Virginia Parole Board which determines
whether they are suitable for release since the prisoners have reached
the eligibility on their sentence, which was 65%.
In January of 1995, the General Assembly enacted what's now considered
the "new law" under the slogan of "Getting Tough On Crime" when then Governor,
George Allen was in office. The "new law legislation" meant, prisoners/persons
in the state of Virginia committing a crime on or after, January 1, 1995
would have no parole eligibility and would have to serve 85% of any sentence
for their crime. This is what caused Virginia and the Department of Corrections
to now house two different sets of prisoners doing sentences under two
different laws.
The new law prisoners do not see the parole board. The the old law
prisoners do, however, since the enactment of the new law, the parole board
has become very stringent at granting parole release for some 9,000 prisoners
who are now in the system eligible for parole.
At a time when resources are constantly shrinking, and Virginia keeps
coming up with budget short-falls, and prisons eating up an increasing
amount of state budgets across the nation, we would like to think our legislators
would consider changing the way they're operating, to save you, the taxpayers,
unnecessary burdens, particularly of footing the bill for rehabilitated,
able bodied prisoners who should be released so they can now work and pay
their own way . However, this is not what our legislators desire to do
in order to best serve the interests of the citizens and state.
Please view what Delegate David B. Albo (R-Fairfax) has to say about
new prison building in Virginia for the next 6 years in the "Washington
Past", dated, Sunday, June 22, 2008 on this site. (see Article)
These projections are about business people, prison building
has become "Big Business" for some people involved, because these people
reap large financial benefits, while you, the taxpayers are only stuck
footing the bill for the building of these $100 million dollar prisons,
the housing of the prisoners and the $25 million dollar annual costs to
operate "Each" prison in Virginia.
All this prison building business is not in the best interest of
the public as they wish you to believe. This sales tactic only serves the
best interest of the people involved who are prospering financially from
"mass incarceration" of Virginia citizens/ The Virginia Parole Board members
prosper well financially in this business. That's really what this expose
is about, and the true reason the parole grant rate has declined so tremendously
in Virginia.
The Parole Board Chairman, Ms Helen F. Fahey gets paid a (six) figure
salary, and the remaining Parole Board members earn (five) figure annual
salaries.
Virginia has the lowest parole grant rate in the nation at 5% or
less presently. There are only about 9,000 prisoners left in the system
eligible for parole as previously mentioned. The fact that the Virginia
Parole Board has the lowest grant rate in the nation has been and still
remains a topic for a number of prisoners rights advocacy groups, some
concerned taxpayers, family members of prisoners, and the Legal Aid Society.
Everyone involved wants to know why the Virginia Parole Board continues
to deny rehabilitated, able bodied prisoners parole, year, after year,
after year, based solely on the "nature and circumstances" of a crime these
prisoners committed 15, 20 and even 30 years ago. The answer to this question
is very simple, and the answer is not the reason Ms Fahey states, "The
reason it's so hard to make decisions on the 9,000 prisoners left, they're
the worst of the worst." This statement is false.
| Ms Fahey also states in inquiries and interviews some prisoners
need to be kept in a structured environment because it forces them to do
better, and the parole board decisions are made in the best interest of
the publics' safety.
There is no way to 'Force' a prisoner to do better, especially in
the prison system as it stands today. The new law has no incentive and
the old law only has hope that someone will finally see the effort they
have put into rehabilitating themselves out of their own initiative.
The parole boards judgment should be in serious questioning by you,
the citizens, based on their actions, because their actions are completely
contrary to their words.
The "nature and circumstances" of a capital murderers offense warrants
granting him/her parole to live next door, but "the nature and circumstances"
of other prisoners crimes that are not capital offenses, does not warrant
that prisoner parole to live next door.
Maybe this type of reasoning, being made by the people your
hard earned tax dollars pay to protect you makes sense to you. I beg to
differ, this type of reasoning to me makes no sense at all, and neither
does it to the parole board and Ms Fahey. |
The parole board doesn't even come out to personally interview prisoners
for parole. (see Articles WOYM) They send
out an interviewer who doesn't have any input in parole sessions. The interviewer
who makes another (5) figure salary, your tax dollars, interviews the prisoner
via video conference.., Takes the interview back to the parole board, who,
in turn can really lay in bed and vote for parole denials over the Internet
annually, and these (5 and 6) digit salaries, your hard earned tax dollars,
just keep rolling in annually. Business as usual, nothing to do with the
best interest of the public.
Another tactic used by the parole board to milk the cash cow (see
the letter dated, December 17, 2005,
on this site from Ms Fahey to one Mr. Keith W. Deblasio concerning
the parole boards decision, not the legislators, the parole boards decision
to do away with the Risk Assessment Guidelines) the legislators laid out
as a road map to determine whether parole eligible prisoners were still
a risk. Ms Fahey states, "the parole board" not the legislators" chose
in the 90's to discontinue use of the guidelines because the guidelines
were out of date and had no usefulness. No guidelines are currently available
for the parole boards' use," she states. (see Parole
Board Legislation)
You have to ask? More importantly, why haven't our Governor and/or
legislators moved since 2005, to provide the board with new Risk Assessment
Guidelines) if none presently exist, so the parole board can get these
prisoners out and relieve the taxpayers of housing them? (see
Correctional
Capitalization and Privatization)
The key is, more prisoners, more business and money, in certain pockets
who are not interested in truly serving the public interest. Our local
public servants, have just like the servants in Washington D.C., now become
self servants to their private interest partners. Your tax dollars are
being wasted, while they're enjoying lots of money from prison business.
You, the taxpayers have the last say in the matter, Government works for
you, but presently you're allowing the Government to work on you.
Votes and demands where local government is concerned counts. You
voted for change in Washington D.C. this past election because Washington
D.C. was continuing down the same old path.
Virginia government has been on the same old path for the last 12
or 13 years. Every year there's budget short-falls - ever wonder why? This
prison business plays a major part!
These (5 and 6) figure annual salaries paid to the parole board is
the real reason the 9,000 prisoners eligible for parole are sitting in
prison at the taxpayers expense. Being turned down for parole, year after
year, solely for the "nature and circumstances of 15, 20 and 30 year old
crimes." The real nature is the (5 and 6) figure annual salaries that will
no longer exist without a parole board.
The true circumstances are, 9,000 prisoners are being denied parole
by an unscrupulous, unethical and financially greedy parole board who's'
sole intent is to suck up all the easy taxpayers dollars they can get before
the cash cow is dry. These parole denials are not only unjust to the prisoners,
they're more of an injustice to the taxpayers who pay dearly to keep us
here.
Someone, once wrote of industry, "an injustice to one citizen is
an injustice to all citizens."
These actions by the parole board is a prime example of that axiom.
You, the taxpayers are the ones who can make the change by demands/votes
concerning our legislators.
If you're tired of this same old path of your legislators, building
prisons, while cutting education, transportation and medical care, then
contact your local legislator via letter, email, or phone even in person,
and demand change. Contact information is available on this site at
How
To Help.
Also see Legislative Bills,
HB
703 is a bill brought up in the House to have the Parole Board adopt
a Risk Assessment Scale but as you will see, it FAILED! WHY? That is the
question you need to ask yourself. |